how do you estimate story points in scrum

Relative Effort Assessment in Agile Development

A technique employed within agile frameworks to gauge the complexity, uncertainty, and effort involved in completing a product backlog item. It emphasizes comparative sizing rather than absolute time estimation.

Core Principles of Relative Sizing

  • Comparative Analysis: Backlog items are evaluated in relation to each other, using a baseline item as a reference point.
  • Emphasis on Effort: The focus is on the overall effort required, encompassing complexity, risks, and dependencies, rather than simply the time to complete.
  • Collaborative Discussion: The development team collectively discusses and agrees upon the relative size of each item.
  • Units of Measure: Abstract units, such as numerical sequences (e.g., Fibonacci sequence), are used to represent relative size.

Common Techniques for Assignment

  • Planning Poker: A game-like technique where team members simultaneously reveal their size estimates. Discrepancies prompt discussion and refinement until consensus is reached.
  • T-Shirt Sizing: Utilizing categories like XS, S, M, L, XL to represent levels of effort.
  • Affinity Mapping: Grouping similar items together based on perceived effort, and then assigning a relative size to each group.

Benefits of Using Relative Sizing

  • Improved Accuracy: Relative assessments can be more accurate than attempting to directly estimate time, especially in uncertain environments.
  • Enhanced Team Collaboration: The process encourages discussion and shared understanding among team members.
  • Better Forecasting: Historical data on team velocity (the amount of work completed per iteration) can be used to forecast future delivery timelines.
  • Focus on Value: Encourages prioritization of items that deliver the most value for the least effort.

Considerations and Potential Pitfalls

  • Initial Calibration: The team needs to establish a common understanding of what each unit of measure represents.
  • Team Composition: The effectiveness of the process depends on the active participation and diverse perspectives of the development team.
  • Maintaining Consistency: Regularly review and recalibrate the sizing scale to ensure that it remains accurate and relevant.
  • Avoiding Time Conversion: Refrain from directly translating these units into specific time estimates, as this defeats the purpose of relative sizing.